Citation style misbehaving!?
188BET靠谱吗1.) Not sure if the Zotero forums is the right place to discuss citation style issues - albeit it has been done many times previously.
2.) If it is: APA 7 takes citations that on the surface look exactly what they are ie "journal articles" and seemingly randomly does the following.
Either (doi = 10.1186/s12877-019-1306-9):
- In BMC Geriatrics (30.10.2019, Vol.19, Issue 1, p.295)
Or (doi = 10.1177/160940690600500304):
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23
See the difference?The first one goes with "In ..." and puts the volume, issue bits in parenthesis, the second one does it as it should be.
I've played around with the style on editor.citationstyles.org and the first one gets formatted as it does because the else-if condition sets it to be of "paper-conference" type.But there in no indication that it is if you look into the native e.g.json.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Stefan
2.) If it is: APA 7 takes citations that on the surface look exactly what they are ie "journal articles" and seemingly randomly does the following.
Either (doi = 10.1186/s12877-019-1306-9):
- In BMC Geriatrics (30.10.2019, Vol.19, Issue 1, p.295)
Or (doi = 10.1177/160940690600500304):
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23
See the difference?The first one goes with "In ..." and puts the volume, issue bits in parenthesis, the second one does it as it should be.
I've played around with the style on editor.citationstyles.org and the first one gets formatted as it does because the else-if condition sets it to be of "paper-conference" type.But there in no indication that it is if you look into the native e.g.json.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Stefan
How and where are you generating the citations?
Also, make sure you have nothing in your extra field.
That's what did the trick - empty the extra field!Now its no longer "misbehaving" and producing:
- International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 12–23
But why???Just wondering if I missed some obvious documentation.
Thanks!