citeproc-js bug?
188BET靠谱吗Maybe it's just too late here, but I'm getting unexpected results with Zotero 4.0.29.11.
The stripped down style at https://gist.github.com/rmzelle/07cc20759b6dba413771db822974912dhas the following code:
The CSL spec says "When used within cs:citation, the delimiter attribute may be used to specify a delimiter for cites within a citation.".188BET靠谱吗However, I'm seeing (with Zotero's CSL editor):
The stripped down style at https://gist.github.com/rmzelle/07cc20759b6dba413771db822974912dhas the following code:
The CSL spec says "When used within cs:citation, the delimiter attribute may be used to specify a delimiter for cites within a citation.".188BET靠谱吗However, I'm seeing (with Zotero's CSL editor):
This should be
Individual Citations
(fig.,, 1)
(fig.,, 2)
Single Citation (with position "first")
(fig.,, 1,, fig.,, 2)
right?
Individual Citations
(fig.1)
(fig.2)
Single Citation (with position "first")
(fig.1,, fig.2)
188BET靠谱吗https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/62008/use-of-eg-with-numbered-citations/#Item_16
More in a bit.
It's getting later here, I'll bundle up a release tomorrow morning.
For testing, and for projects requiring an immediate fix, install one of the Propachi plugins188BET靠谱吗to run the revised processor in current Zotero.188BET靠谱吗The plugin should be removed at the next Zotero update.
The updated processor is now available in the latest 4.0 and 5.0 Betas188BET靠谱吗of Zotero for Firefox.
Just posted another update ( tag 1.1.120), to address the bug reported here.After discovering that the 1.1.119 fixes didn't address that bug (failure of subsequent-author-substitute with macros shared between cs:citation and cs:bibliography), I initially thought it would be too difficult to fix, at least in the short term.Found a solution, though, and I think this clears all of the bugs that I know about.